To all new members and concerned parties....
We are currently building a website that will enable membership, blogging, and all necessary information on the activist campaign.
It is our intention to garner enough members to the B.R.C. and gain support from the mainstream science community as well as open membership to the concerned or interested public-and publicly confront the journals that are responsible for peer review of ALL science and validation.
Please be patient and we will keep you informed.
In the meantime you can send your contact info to zaskman@gmail.com and I will contact you asap
Thank you, B.R.C. administrator,
Mark A. Zaskey
Friday, January 10, 2014
Thursday, January 9, 2014
B.R.C. Mission Statement
At this point in the case for the existence of Sasquatch there is actually irrifutable physical evidence in the form of DNA. Coupled with photo, video and thousands of credible eyewitness accounts that one cannot simply dissmiss, validation should have been accomplished.
Yet still...a clear conflict exists between the reality of the evidence and those in authority that are responsible for reviewing this evidence and the validation of new species. These "authorities" have flat out refused to ever look at any physical evidence for the existence of Sasquatch..
But why?
Why in the face of physical proof of a new species would these supposedly level headed, educated individuals choose to laugh in the faces of other acredited, practicing professionals and those who say the had a sighting or encounter, when these highly intelligent, rational human beings that have no reason to try to fake empirical DNA evidence...as if it were possible or make up a story about seeing something they actually wanted nothing to do with in the first place?
The answers to this and many other troubling questions in the facts of the case for validation of the Sasquatch species point to some very disturbing conclusions. It is a simple fact that here in the U.S.-There exists a governing body of individuals, most of whom were hand picked and groomed....all of whom prefer to remain behind a curtain of un-checked scientific authority-who apparently answer only to those of like authority.
These individuals have somehow remained unchallenged in their rather un-scientific and morally reprehensible agendas and practices. They have-at times and at great cost to the American people-perverted and subverted good empirical science and scientific discovery that could have changed the very course of mankind for the better-and apparently-for the selfish gain of the few-it seems they have maintained these agendas.
How did we miss this? Why has no one come forward into the light to speak out against this absolutist brotherhood.
Quite frankly, the selfishness and secrecy that has plagued us and motivates many so called Sasquatch research teams or individuals in the un-official reasearch community-has not served the validation issue at all...it has ruined it. Thus far our efforts toward validating the species have been dis-organized, and inept. We must-as one concerned group-unify and take aim at the real issues. It is the primary mission of the B.R.C. to bring together at last-our entire community of researchers across the continent and all available evidence for a unified and public presentation to those that have subverted any and all that have come before them. The B.R.C. should actively administrate and monitor-with public transparency-the entire evidence review process, as well as monitoring all the communications between these authoritative scientific organizations and the individuals who are submitting evidence for review-to ensure and maintain fair and ethical scientific peer review and practices during the review process.
Yet still...a clear conflict exists between the reality of the evidence and those in authority that are responsible for reviewing this evidence and the validation of new species. These "authorities" have flat out refused to ever look at any physical evidence for the existence of Sasquatch..
But why?
Why in the face of physical proof of a new species would these supposedly level headed, educated individuals choose to laugh in the faces of other acredited, practicing professionals and those who say the had a sighting or encounter, when these highly intelligent, rational human beings that have no reason to try to fake empirical DNA evidence...as if it were possible or make up a story about seeing something they actually wanted nothing to do with in the first place?
The answers to this and many other troubling questions in the facts of the case for validation of the Sasquatch species point to some very disturbing conclusions. It is a simple fact that here in the U.S.-There exists a governing body of individuals, most of whom were hand picked and groomed....all of whom prefer to remain behind a curtain of un-checked scientific authority-who apparently answer only to those of like authority.
These individuals have somehow remained unchallenged in their rather un-scientific and morally reprehensible agendas and practices. They have-at times and at great cost to the American people-perverted and subverted good empirical science and scientific discovery that could have changed the very course of mankind for the better-and apparently-for the selfish gain of the few-it seems they have maintained these agendas.
How did we miss this? Why has no one come forward into the light to speak out against this absolutist brotherhood.
Quite frankly, the selfishness and secrecy that has plagued us and motivates many so called Sasquatch research teams or individuals in the un-official reasearch community-has not served the validation issue at all...it has ruined it. Thus far our efforts toward validating the species have been dis-organized, and inept. We must-as one concerned group-unify and take aim at the real issues. It is the primary mission of the B.R.C. to bring together at last-our entire community of researchers across the continent and all available evidence for a unified and public presentation to those that have subverted any and all that have come before them. The B.R.C. should actively administrate and monitor-with public transparency-the entire evidence review process, as well as monitoring all the communications between these authoritative scientific organizations and the individuals who are submitting evidence for review-to ensure and maintain fair and ethical scientific peer review and practices during the review process.
Our Creed
"It is with firm footing that we, the concerned, take this next crucial step in the worldwide realization and validation of this, the rarest of our humankind. Resolute, we shall stare down the faces of the oppressors and the tyrannical monarch of absolutist scientific agenda. For it is with selfless concern for ALL human life that we
....Stand our ground."
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)